One of the biggest issues these days that regard politics
and energy is the Keystone XL Pipeline. The Keystone Pipeline is a pipeline that
carries synthetic crude oil and bitumen from Alberta, Canada to multiple parts
of the U.S., running all the way to the gulf coast of Texas. This is a major
issue due to the many environmental risk that pipeline extension would cause.
Some of the risk is the pipeline could pollute the air and contaminate our
water supply. It also poses hazard to migratory birds and other wildlife. Also
the construction of the pipeline could potentially cause earthquakes because it
crosses through an active seismic zone.
One of the political highlights was not a debate over oil
versus alternative energy, but whether we wanted oil from Canada, or Venezuela.
The CEO of TransCanada, which is one of the companies involved in the pipeline,
said that if the Canadian oil doesn’t reach the Gulf in an Environmentally
friendly way, the it would be brought by tankers that produce higher
greenhouse- gas emissions and put the environment at greater risk. I felt that
this statement is very misleading; what he is saying is technically true, but
the all the other environmentally issues that come with building the pipeline
is nothing compared to greenhouse gasses. The plans for this pipeline would go
throw very valuables places to our environment like the Sandhills in Nebraska,
which s the largest wetland ecosystem and it would also cross the Ogallala
Aquifer, one of the largest freshwater reserve in the world. By destroying and
possible polluting these areas, it would do more harm to the environment than
tankers releasing greenhouse gasses. Aside from the physical harm to the environments,
people who live on the lands that pipeline would cross, would also be in
affected. They would be living in fence-line areas and that would cause major health
issues to some people. Some people have already been threatened by TransCanada
to confiscate private land, before the government even came to a decision.
AMen, should also report on the Flouride intake and negative effects
ReplyDeleteI agree, the pipeline is not the issue, the pipeline is unnecessary if we face the fact that we need an alternative way to fuel our cars, heat our homes, run our machines other than with oil and goal.
ReplyDelete